Let be a complete
-dimensional Riemannian manifold and, as usual, denote by
its Laplace-Beltrami operator. As in the previous lecture, we will assume that the Ricci curvature of
is bounded from below by
with
. Our purpose in this lecture is to prove a Gaussian upper bound for the heat kernel. Our main tools are the parabolic Harnack inequality proved in the previous lecture and the following integrated maximum principle:
Proposition Let be a non positive continuous function such that, in the sense of distributions,
then, for every , we have
.
Proof: Since
, multiplying this identity by
, where
is the usual localizing sequence , and integrating by parts, we obtain
where in the last inequality we have made use of the assumption on . From this we conclude
We now claim that
To see this we apply Cauchy-Schwarz inequality which gives
as . With the claim in hands we now let
in the above inequality
obtaining
We are now ready for the main result of this lecture:
Theorem: For any there exist positive constants
and
, such that for every
and
one has
Proof: Given , and
we fix
. For a function
, with
, in
we consider the function
Since , it satisfies the Cauchy problem
Let be a non positive continuous function such that, in the sense of distributions,
From the previous lemma, we know that:
At this point we fix and for
consider the indicator function
of the ball
. Let
,
, be a sequence such that
in
, with supp
. Slightly abusing the notation we now set
Thanks to the symmetry of
, we have
Applying the integrated maximum principle to , we find
At this point we observe that as
By similar considerations we find
Letting we thus conclude that the same inequality holds with
replaced by
. This implies in particular the basic estimate
.
At this point we choose Using the fact that
, one can easily check that
satisfies
Taking into account that
if we now choose , then from the previous inequality we conclude that
We now apply the Harnack inequality which gives for every
Integrating this inequality on we find
Thus, we obtain
Choosing in this inequality we find
We now apply again the Harnack inequality to obtain for every
Integrating this inequality in , we have
Combining this inequality with the above inequality we conclude
If now , then
and therefore
If instead , then for every
we have
. Choosing
we find
and therefore
For any we now choose
such that
to reach the desired conclusion