Definition: A differential operator on
, is called a diffusion operator if it can be written
where and
are continuous functions on
and if for every
, the matrix
is a symmetric and nonnegative matrix.
If for every the matrix
is positive definite, then the operator
is said to be elliptic. The first example of a diffusion operator is the Laplace operator on
:
It is of course an elliptic operator.
One of the first property of diffusion operators is that they satisfy a maximum principle. Before we state this principle let us recall the following simple result from linear algebra.
Lemma. Let and
be two symmetric and nonnegative matrices, then
Proof:
Since is symmetric and non negative, there exists a symmetric and non negative matrix
such that
. We have then
The matrix is seen to be symmetric and nonnegative and thus has a non negative trace.
Proposition (Maximum principle for diffusion operators). Let be a smooth function that attains a local minimum at
. If
is a diffusion operator then
.
Proof:
Let
and let be a smooth function that attains a local minimum at
. We have
where is the symmetric and non negative matrix with coefficients
and
is the Hessian matrix of
, that is the symmetric matrix with coefficients
. Since
is a local minimum of
,
is a non negative matrix. We can now use the previous lemma to get the expected result
It is remarkable that, together with the linearity, this maximum principle characterizes the diffusion operators:
Theorem. Let be the set of smooth functions
and let
be the set of continuous functions
. Let now
be an operator such that:
is linear;
- If
has a local minimum at
,
.
Then is a diffusion operator.
Proof:
Let us consider an operator that satisfies the two above properties. As a first observation, it is readily seen from the third point that
transforms constant functions into the zero function. Let now
be fixed in the following argument. We are going to show that if
is a smooth function, then
The idea will then be to use the Taylor expansion formula. For , the function
admits a local minimum at , thus
By letting , we therefore obtain
By considering now the function
we show in the very same way that
As a conclusion
Let now be a smooth function. By the Taylor expansion formula, there exists a smooth function
such that in a neighborhood of
By applying the operator to the previous equality, and by taking account the previous observations we obtain
By denoting now,
and
we reach the conclusion
The matrix, is seen to be non negative, because for every
,
Now, the function is seen to attain a local minimum at
, so that from the maximum principle
Finally, since transforms smooth into continuous functions, the functions
‘s and
‘s are seen to be continuous
Exercise. Let be a linear operator such that:
is a local operator, that is if
on a neighborhood of
then
;
- If
has a global maximum at
with
then
.
Show that for and
,
where ,
and
are continuous functions on
such that for every
,
and the matrix
is symmetric and nonnegative.
The previous theorem is actually a special case of a beautiful theorem that is due to Courrège that classifies the operators satisfying the positive global maximum principle. We mention this theorem without proof because the result will not be needed in the following. A complete proof may be found in the original article by Courrège.
We denote by the space of smooth and compactly supported functions
. A linear operator
is said to satisfy the positive maximum principle if for every function
that has a global maximum at
with
then
.
In the following statement denotes the set of Borel sets on
and a kernel
on
is a family
of Borel measures.
Theorem (Courrège’s theorem) Let be a linear operator. Then
satisfies the positive maximum principle if and only if there exist functions
,
,
and a kernel
on
such that for every
and
,
where , with
takes the constant value 1 on the ball
. In addition, for every
,
and the matrix
is a symmetric and nonnegative matrix. The functions
‘s and
are continuous. Moreover for every
, the function
is upper semicontinuous.
Bonjour,
1. In the proof of the first theorem, you write “satisfies the three above properties”, aren’t there just two in the list ?
2. Concerning second condition in the exercise ” ….. $Lf(x) \geq 0$ ” , I am wondering if it should be replaced by $Lf(x) \leq 0$, which is consistent with the statement of Th\’eor\`eme 0.1 of the paper by courr\`ege.
Best, luc
Merci ! I made the corrections.