In this lecture we define the Young‘s integral when
and
with
. The cornerstone is the following Young-Loeve estimate.
Theorem: Let and
. Consider now
with
. The following estimate holds: for
,
Proof: For , let us define
We have for ,
As a consequence, we get
Let now . We claim that
is a control. The continuity and the vanishing on the diagonal are obvious to check, so we just need to justify the superadditivity. Let
, we have from Holder’s inequality,
We have then
For , consider then the control
Define now
If is such that
, we can find a
such that
,
. Indeed, the continuity of
forces the existence of a
such that
. We obtain therefore
which implies by maximization,
By iterating times this inequality, we obtain
It is now clear that:
Since
We conclude
and thus
Sending , finishes the proof
It is remarkable that the Young-Loeve estimate only involves and
. As a consequence, we obtain the following result whose proof is let to the reader:
Proposition: Let and
with
. Let us assume that there exists a sequence
such that
in
and a sequence
such that
in
, then for every
,
converges to a limit that we call the Young’s integral of
against
on the interval
and denote
.
The integral does not depend of the sequences
and
and the following estimate holds: for
,
The closure of in
is
and we know that
. It is therefore obvious to extend the Young’s integral for every
and
with
and the Young-Loeve estimate still holds
From this estimate, we easily see that for and
with
the sequence of Riemann sums
will converge to when the mesh of the subdivision goes to 0. We record for later use the following estimate on the Young’s integral, which is also an easy consequence of the Young-Loeve estimate (see Theorem 6.8 in the book for further details).
Proposition: Let and
with
. The integral path
is continuous with a finite
-variation and we have
In the first proposition, does y^n go to y (as opposed to x)?