In the previous lecture we defined the Young’s integral when
and
with
. The integral path
has then a bounded
-variation. Now, if
is a Lipschitz map, then the integral,
is only defined when
, that is for
. With this in mind, it is apparent that Young’s integration should be useful to solve differential equations driven by continuous paths with bounded
-variation for
. If
, then the Young’s integral is of no help and the rough paths theory later explained is the correct one.
The basic existence and uniqueness result is the following. Throughout this lecture, we assume that .
Theorem: Let and let
be a Lipschitz continuous map, that is there exists a constant
such that for every
,
For every , there is a unique solution to the differential equation:
Moreover .
Proof: The proof is of course based again of the fixed point theorem. Let and consider the map
going from the space
into itself, which is defined by
By using basic estimates on the Young’s integrals, we deduce that
If is small enough, then
, which means that
is a contraction of the Banach space
endowed with the norm
.
The fixed point of , let us say
, is the unique solution to the differential equation:
By considering then a subdivision
such that , we obtain a unique solution to the differential equation:
As for the bounded variation case, the solution of a Young’s differential equation is a function of the initial condition,
Proposition: Let and let
be a
Lipschitz continuous map. Let
be the flow of the equation
Then for every , the map
is
and the Jacobian
is the unique solution of the matrix linear equation
As we already mentioned it before, solutions of Young’s differential equations are continuous with respect to the driving path in the -variation topology
Theorem: Let and let
be a Lipschitz and bounded continuous map such that for every
,
Let be the solution of the differential equation:
If converges to
in
-variation, then
converges in
-variation to the solution of the differential equation:
Proof: Let . We have
Thus, if is such that
, we obtain
In the very same way, provided , we get
Let us fix and pick a sequence
such that
. Since
, for
with
big enough, we have
We deduce that for ,
and
For with
and big enough, we have
which implies