Lecture 2. Quadratic forms in Hilbert spaces

Contents

Quadratic forms and generators

Definition A quadratic form β„° on H is a non-negative definite, symmetric bilinear form π’Ÿ(β„°) Γ— π’Ÿ(β„°) β†’ ℝ, where π’Ÿ(β„°) is a dense subspace of H. A quadratic form β„° on H is said to be closed if π’Ÿ(β„°) equipped with the norm

β€–fβ€–π’Ÿ(β„°)2= β€–fβ€–2 + β„°(f,f)

is a Hilbert space. A quadratic form β„° on H is said to be closable it admits a closed extension, i.e. there exists a closed quadratic form β„°’ such that π’Ÿ(β„°) βŠ‚ π’Ÿ(β„°’) and β„°’ coincides with β„° on π’Ÿ(β„°) Γ— π’Ÿ(β„°).

Lemma A quadratic form β„° is closable if and only if for any sequence fn in π’Ÿ(β„°) such that fn β†’ 0 in H and β„°(fn – fm, fn – fm) β†’ 0 when n, m β†’ +∞ one has β„°(fn, fn) β†’ 0.

Proof

On π’Ÿ(β„°), let us consider the following norm

||f||β„°2 = ||f||2 + β„°(f, f).

By completing π’Ÿ(β„°) with respect to this norm, we get an abstract Hilbert space (Hβ„°,βŸ¨β‹…,β‹…βŸ©β„°). Since for f ∈ π’Ÿ(β„°), ||f|| ≀ ||f||β„°, the injection map ΞΉ : (π’Ÿ(β„°), || Β· ||β„°) β†’ (H, || Β· ||) is continuous and it may therefore be extended into a continuous map αΏ‘ : (Hβ„°, || Β· ||β„°) β†’ (H, || Β· ||). Let us show that Μ„ΞΉ is injective so that Hβ„° may be identified with a subspace of H. So, let f ∈ Hβ„° such that αΏ‘(f) = 0. We can find a sequence fn ∈ π’Ÿ(β„°), such that || fn – f ||β„° β†’ 0 and || fn || β†’ 0. We have then

||f||β„°2 = limn β†’ + ∞ ⟨fn, fnβŸ©β„°

= limn β†’ + ∞ ⟨fn,fn⟩ + β„°(fn, fn)

= 0,

thus f=0 and αΏ‘ is injective. Therefore, Hβ„° may be identified with a subspace of H and the quadratic form on H defined by

β„°'(f) = ||f||β„°2 – ||f||2, f ∈ Hβ„°

is closed because (Hβ„°,βŸ¨β‹…,β‹…βŸ©β„°) is a Hilbert space and obviously is an extension of β„°.

If a quadratic form β„° is closable, then its minimal closed extension is called the closure of β„°. In that case, one can easily check that the closure of β„° is actually the quadratic form β„° constructed in the previous proof.

Theorem Let β„° be a closed symmetric non-negative bilinear form on H. There exists a unique densely defined non-positive self-adjoint operator A on H defined by

π’Ÿ(A) = {f ∈ H, βˆƒg ∈ H, βˆ€h ∈ H, β„°(f,h) = -⟨h,g⟩}

Af = g.

The operator A is called the generator of β„°. Conversely, if A is a densely defined non-positive self-adjoint operator on H, one can define a closed symmetric non-negative bilinear form β„° on H by

π’Ÿ(β„°) = π’Ÿ((-A)1/2), β„°(f,g) = ⟨(-A)1/2f,(-A)1/2g⟩.

Proof

Let β„° be a closed symmetric non-negative bilinear form on H. As usual, we denote by β„± the domain of β„°. We note that for Ξ» > 0, β„± equipped with the norm (||f||2 + Ξ»β„°(f))1/2 is a Hilbert space because β„° is closed. From the Riesz representation theorem, there exists then a linear operator RΞ» :H β†’ β„± such that for every f ∈ H, g ∈ β„±

⟨f,g⟩ = λ⟨RΞ» f , g⟩ + β„°(RΞ» f,g).

From the definition, the following properties are then easily checked:

  1. ||RΞ»f|| ≀ (1/Ξ») ||f|| (apply the definition of RΞ» with g = RΞ»f and then use the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality);
  2. For every f,g ∈ H, ⟨Rλf , g⟩ = ⟨f , Rλg⟩;
  3. RΞ»1 – RΞ»2 + (Ξ»1 – Ξ»2)RΞ»1RΞ»2 = 0;
  4. For every f ∈ H, limΞ» β†’ +∞ || Ξ»RΞ»f -f || = 0.

We then claim that RΞ» is invertible. Indeed, if RΞ»f = 0, then for Ξ± > Ξ» , one has from 3, RΞ±f = 0. Therefore f = limΞ± β†’ +∞ RΞ±f = 0. Denote then

Af = Ξ»f – RΞ»-1f,

and π’Ÿ(A) is the range of RΞ». It is straightforward to check that A does not depend on Ξ». The operator A is a densely defined self-adjoint operator that satisfies the properties stated in the theorem (Exercise !).

Conversely, if A is a densely defined non-positive self-adjoint operator on H, then (-A)1/2 is a densely defined self-adjoint operator and the quadratic form

β„°(f,g) := ⟨(-A)1/2f, (-A)1/2g⟩

is closed and densely defined on π’Ÿ((-A)1/2).

Exercise Prove the properties 1,2,3,4 of the previous proof.

In practice, the following lemma is often useful to construct closed quadratic forms and easily follows from the previous results.

Lemma Let A be a densely defined non-positive symmetric operator π’Ÿ(A) β†’ H. The quadratic form

β„°(f,g) = -⟨f, Ag⟩, f,g ∈ π’Ÿ(A)

is closable and the generator of its closure is a self-adjoint extension of A.

Semigroups and quadratic forms

Theorem Let (Pt)tβ‰₯0 be a strongly continuous self-adjoint contraction semigroup on H. One can define a closed quadratic form on H by

β„°(f,f) := limt β†’ 0 ⟨(Id – Pt)/t f, f⟩,

where the domain of this form is the set of f‘s for which the limit exists. The quadratic form β„° is called the quadratic form associated to the semigroup (Pt)tβ‰₯0.

Proof

Let A be the generator of the semigroup (Pt)t β‰₯ 0. We use spectral theorem to represent A as

U-1 A U g(x) = -Ξ»(x) g(x),

so that

U-1 Pt U g(x) = e-tΞ»(x) g(x).

We then note that for every g ∈ L2(Ω,ν),

⟨(Id – Pt)/t Ug, Ug⟩ = ∫Ω (1 – e-tΞ»(x))/t g(x)2 dΞ½(x).

This proves that for every f ∈ H, the map t β†’ ⟨(Id – Pt)/t f, f⟩ is non-increasing. Therefore, the limit limt β†’ 0 ⟨(Id – Pt)/t f, f⟩ exists if and only if ∫Ω (U-1f)2(x) Ξ»(x) dΞ½(x) < +∞, which is equivalent to the fact that f ∈ π’Ÿ((-A)1/2). In which case we have

limt β†’ 0 ⟨(Id – Pt)/t f, f⟩ = ||(-A)1/2f||2.

Since (-A)1/2 is a densely defined self-adjoint operator, the quadratic form

β„°(f) := ||(-A)1/2f||2

is closed and densely defined on β„± := π’Ÿ((-A)1/2).

A first example: The Dirichlet energy on an open set Ξ© βŠ‚ ℝn

Let Ξ© βŠ‚ ℝn be an open connected set. We do not assume any regularity on the boundary of Ξ©. Classically, one can define the (1,2) Sobolev space

W1,2(Ξ©) = {f ∈ L2(Ξ©) : βˆ‚f/βˆ‚xi ∈ L2(Ξ©)}

where the derivatives βˆ‚u/βˆ‚xi are understood in the weak sense. The quadratic form

β„°(f,g) = ∫Ω βŸ¨βˆ‡f, βˆ‡g⟩ dx = βˆ‘i=1n ∫Ω βˆ‚f/βˆ‚xi βˆ‚g/βˆ‚xi dx

with domain W1,2(Ξ©) is then a closed densely defined quadratic form on L2(Ξ©) since it is well-known that the Sobolev norm

||f||2W1,2(Ξ©) = ||f||2L2(Ξ©) + ||βˆ‡f||2L2(Ξ©)

is complete. The generator of the form β„° is called the Neumann Laplacian on Ξ©.

On the other hand, let

Ξ” = βˆ‘i=1n βˆ‚2/βˆ‚xi2

be the usual Laplacian on ℝn, the derivatives being understood in the ordinary sense, and Cc∞(Ξ©) be the set of smooth functions with a compact support included in Ξ©. Then, from a lemma, the quadratic form

β„°0(f,g) = -∫Ω f Ξ”g dx

with domain Cc∞(Ξ©) is closable. The domain of the closure of β„°0 is the Sobolev space W01,2(Ξ©) and the generator of the closure of β„°0 is called the Dirichlet Laplacian on Ξ©.

Notice that both the Neumann and the Dirichlet Laplacian are self-adjoint extensions of the Laplacian Ξ” with domain Cc∞(Ξ©). In general, the Neumann and Dirichlet Laplacian do not coincide. For instance if the boundary of Ξ© is smooth, then smooth functions in the domain of the Neumann Laplacian have vanishing normal derivatives while smooth functions in the domain of the Dirichlet Laplacian vanish on the boundary of u.

This entry was posted in Dirichlet forms at NYU and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment