In the previous Lecture, we proved that any martingale which is adapted to a Brownian filtration can be written as a stochastic integral. In this section, we prove that any martingale can also be represented as a time changed Brownian motion. To prove this fact, we give first first a characterization of the Brownian motion which is interesting in itself. In this section, we denote by a filtration that satisfies the usual conditions.
Proposition: (Levy’s characterization theorem) Let be a continuous local martingale such that
and such that for every
,
. The process
is a standard Brownian motion.
Proof. Let . By using Itō’s formula, we obtain that for
,
As a consequence, the process is a martingale and, from the above equality we get
The process is therefore a continuous process with stationary and independent increments such that
is normally distributed with mean 0 and variance
. It is thus a Brownian motion
The next proposition shows that continuous martingales behave in a nice way with respect to time changes.
Proposition Let be a continuous and increasing process such that for every
,
is a finite stopping time of the filtration
. Let
be a continuous martingale with respect to
. The process
is a local martingale with respect to the filtration
. Moreover
.
Proof. . By using localization, we may assume to be bounded. According to the Doob’s stopping theorem, we need to prove that for every bounded stopping time
of the filtration
, we have
. But
is obviously a bounded stopping time of the filtration
and thus from Doob’s stopping theorem we have
. The same argument shows that
Exercise. Let be an increasing and right continuous process such that for every
,
is a finite stopping time of the filtration
. Let
be a continuous martingale with respect to
such that
is constant on each interval
. Show that the process
is a continuous local martingale with respect to the filtration
and that
.
We can now prove the following nice representation result for martingales.
Theorem. ( Dambis, Dubins-Schwarz) Let be a continuous martingale such that
and
. There exists a Brownian motion
, such that for every
,
Proof. Let .
is a right continuous and increasing process such that for every
,
is a finite stopping time of the filtration
and
is obviously constant on each interval
. From the previous exercise the process
is a local martingale whose quadratic variation is equal to
. From Levy’s characterization theorem, it is thus a Brownian motion
Exercise. Show that if is a continuous local martingale such that
and
, there exists a Brownian motion
, such that for every
,
Exercise.
Let be a continuous adapted process and let
be a Brownian motion. Show that for every
, the process
has
Holder paths, where
.
The study of the planar Brownian is deeply connected to the theory of analytic functions. The fundamental property of the Brownian curve is that it is a conformal invariant. The following proposition is easily proved as a consequence of Itō’s formula and of the Dambins-Dubins-Schwarz theorem. By definition, a complex Brownian motion is a process in the complex plane that can be decomposed as
where
and
are independent Brownian motions.
Proposition.(Conformal invariance of the planar Brownian motion) Let be a complex Brownian motion and
be an analytic function. Then
As a consequence, there exists a complex Brownian motion such that
To study the complex Brownian motion, it is useful to look at it in polar coordinates. It leads to the so-called skew-product decomposition of the complex Brownian motion.
Proposition. Let be a complex Brownian motion started at
. There exists a complex Brownian motion
such that
where
.
Proof. The proof is let as an exercise to the reader. The main idea is to prove, by using Itō’s formula, that and then to used the Dambins-Dubins-Schwarz theorem
Exercise. In the previous proposition, show that the process is independent from the process
.
You will find below a video of a talk by Pr. Marc Yor concerning quadratic functionals of the planar Brownian motion. The talk was given at the University of Bristol in December 2008 for a special event.
In the proof of Dambis, Dubins-Schwarz, C_t is NOT necessarily continuous (e.g., let M_t be a BM, staying put for exponential times at the rings of an exponential clock). Hence the proof here is very much incomplete, isn’t it?
Thanks, this is now corrected